
3D Electromagnetics, powered by Palace
The cylinder_waveguide example applies a translational periodic boundary connecting the two end faces (zero phase shift, pure geometric translation). This computes the propagating guided modes of an effectively infinite uniform waveguide from a single short section.
- Translation periodic condition — the donor face maps onto the receiver face displaced by [0, 0, −5.48] (in L0 units); enforcing continuity yields the modes of the periodically continued guide
- Guided modes and cutoff — the eigenfrequencies give the cutoff frequencies and mode set of the waveguide directly
- Order-4 elements on a tetrahedral mesh, tolerance 1e-9 for tight mode accuracy
- Problem type: Eigenmode, tetrahedral mesh, length unit L0 = 1 cm
- Material: dielectric fill, εr = 2.08, μr = 1.0, loss tangent 0.0004
- Boundaries: end faces = Periodic (translation [0, 0, −5.48]); side wall = PEC
- Eigensolver: 15 eigenpairs, target 2.0 GHz, tolerance 1e-9
- Inner solve: GMRES + multigrid preconditioner, GPU device (order 4)
The core transferable physics: a uniform waveguide carries a discrete set of guided modes, each with a cutoff frequency below which it cannot propagate. Extracting these modes from a short periodic section reveals which modes carry power in a band and where single-mode operation begins and ends — the foundation of all guided-wave component design.
Translational periodicity gives the modes of an arbitrarily long uniform guide from one short section — minimal mesh, exact modes.
The eigenfrequencies are the mode cutoffs, defining the single-mode band without hand calculation.
Ridged, dielectric-loaded, or arbitrary guides are handled the same way — no analytic formula required.
Order 4 with a tight 1e-9 tolerance produces reference-quality mode frequencies.
Select a domain to see how this simulation applies, with industry-specific scenarios and ROI.
Every waveguide component — filters, couplers, transitions, twists, bends — is built on a specific guided mode within a specific single-mode band. Choosing the guide cross-section, verifying the operating band is single-mode, and knowing where higher-order modes turn on are the first steps of any design. For non-standard or dielectric-loaded guides there is no closed-form answer.
Getting the mode/cutoff picture wrong means components that moding-up in band, generating spurious responses discovered only in test — a rebuild costing thousands and weeks.
Periodic eigenmode analysis extracts the guided modes and cutoffs for any cross-section, defining the usable band up front.
| Application | How this simulation maps |
|---|---|
| Custom waveguide design | Cutoff frequencies define the single-mode operating band |
| Ridged / dielectric-loaded guides | Modes of non-analytic cross-sections extracted directly |
| Moding / spurious screening | Higher-mode cutoffs flag where components mode-up |
Scenario: A waveguide-component shop develops 30 custom-guide designs/year at 5 build-test iterations each. Mode/cutoff analysis cuts iterations to 2.
Confident single-mode band definition also unlocks aggressive miniaturization that would be too risky by trial and error.
Model your guide section
Replace the cross-section with your waveguide and set the translation for the periodic faces to get the guided modes.
Read cutoffs and modes
Identify the single-mode band and where higher-order modes turn on for your geometry.
Move to driven S-params
Use waveguide for driven wave-port S-parameters, or cylinder_floquet for phased/periodic structures.
Run this example on NumericalAI's cloud platform. No installation, no infrastructure management — just results.
© 2026 NumericalAI, all rights reserved. |Privacy Policy |Terms of Service |Executive brief |FAQ