
3D Electromagnetics, powered by Palace
The cpw_coax_uniform example is a driven full-wave S-parameter extraction of a coplanar-waveguide (CPW) transmission line. It excites the line through coaxial ports and computes the reflection (S₁₁) and transmission (S₂₁) across frequency using a uniform sweep.
- Coaxial-port excitation — the CPW is fed through a coaxial launch, modeling the real connector-to-board transition rather than an idealized termination
- S-parameters — |S₁₁| (match) and |S₂₁| (transmission) capture both the line and the coax-to-CPW transition that dominates real-world return loss
- Uniform frequency sweep — one full-wave solve at each equally-spaced frequency point, giving a predictable, easy-to-interpret broadband response
- Problem type: Driven (frequency domain), coplanar-waveguide line on a dielectric substrate
- Excitation: Coaxial Ports at each end of the line
- Frequency sweep: uniform
- Output: S₁₁ / S₂₁ vs frequency, characteristic impedance, field animation
- Solver: GMRES + multigrid preconditioner, GPU device, high-order elements
The core transferable physics: a coplanar waveguide carries a quasi-TEM signal whose match and loss are captured by its S-parameters. The choice of port model and frequency-sweep strategy trades accuracy against speed. This family of examples lets engineers pick the right modeling approach for their planar interconnect, package trace, or on-chip line.
Coaxial ports model the physical connector transition, capturing the launch reflections that lumped and wave ports on the line alone cannot see — closest to bench measurement.
A fixed-step sweep resolves every resonance and ripple at known frequencies — the safest choice when the response shape is unknown up front.
S₁₁/S₂₁ vs frequency map directly to return and insertion loss — the metrics signal-integrity and RF engineers specify against.
Fast driven solves make broadband characterization of interconnect practical inside a design iteration.
Select a domain to see how this simulation applies, with industry-specific scenarios and ROI.
Coplanar waveguide is the workhorse interconnect of RF and microwave circuits — feeding MMICs, connecting components, and forming distributed elements. Its characteristic impedance and loss are set by the trace/gap geometry and substrate, and a poorly matched line reflects power, ripples the response, and degrades noise figure.
Empirically tuning CPW lines and transitions on fabricated boards costs $8K–$30K per iteration in prototypes and lab time. Getting the S-parameters right in simulation collapses those loops.
Driven CPW extraction gives the exact match and loss for the line and its transitions before fabrication.
| Application | How this simulation maps |
|---|---|
| CPW impedance control | S₁₁ confirms 50 Ω match vs trace/gap geometry |
| MMIC / connector transitions | Reflection and loss at launches quantified before build |
| Broadband loss budgeting | S₂₁ vs frequency sets insertion loss across the band |
Scenario: An RF module team develops 40 CPW-based designs/year at 4 board iterations each. Driven S-parameter simulation cuts iterations to 1.5.
Fewer board spins per design also compress schedule, getting RF modules to customers faster.
Characterize your line
Load your CPW geometry and substrate, apply coaxial ports, and run the driven solve to get S-parameters.
Sweep the band
Use the uniform sweep to capture the broadband response efficiently and verify match/loss.
Compare modeling choices
Contrast lumped, wave, and coax ports and uniform vs adaptive sweeps across the cpw_* family to pick the best accuracy/speed trade-off.
Run this example on NumericalAI's cloud platform. No installation, no infrastructure management — just results.
© 2026 NumericalAI, all rights reserved. |Privacy Policy |Terms of Service |Executive brief |FAQ