
3D Electromagnetics
Explore GPU-accelerated computational electromagnetics (CEM) powered by NumericalAI and the open-source Palace 3D finite-element solver. Designing a quantum processor means knowing — before fabrication — exactly where each qubit and coupler will resonate. An eigenmode analysis finds those natural frequencies and field patterns directly from the layout, no drive signal required, by solving the source-free curl-curl eigenproblem.
This example models a grid of superconducting qubits patterned on a sapphire chip. Each qubit's Josephson junction is represented as a lumped inductor–capacitor (LC) port, and Palace computes the collective, hybridized modes of the whole array near the transmon operating band. The result is a full-wave picture of how energy distributes across the chip — the foundation for predicting qubit frequencies, couplings, and stray resonances.

Electric energy density (U_e) of a computed eigenmode across the qubit lattice and its coupling network, on the meshed sapphire chip.
Twelve lumped ports stand in for the Josephson junctions of the qubits. Each is a linearized junction: an inductance L = 14.86 nH shunted by a capacitance C = 5.5 fF, oriented along +Y across the junction gap. In the small-signal (linear) limit this is exactly how a transmon presents itself to the surrounding electromagnetic environment.
Because all twelve ports share the same chip, the eigensolver returns the hybridized modes of the full grid — collective resonances in which energy is shared between neighbouring qubits and their coupling structures. This is what turns a set of nominal qubit frequencies into the real, coupled spectrum that governs gate performance and crosstalk.
Structure:
Multi-qubit QPU grid
Qubit ports:
12 lumped LC
Length unit:
µm (L₀ = 1e-6)
Mesh:
Tetrahedral
Element order:
1
Permittivity (in-plane):
9.3
Permittivity (c-axis):
11.5
Anisotropy:
Uniaxial, rotated axes
Loss tangent:
3e-5 / 8.6e-5
Vacuum region:
εᵣ = µᵣ = 1.0
Problem type:
Eigenmode
Eigenpairs:
2
Target:
4.0 GHz
Inner solver:
GMRES + AMS
Tolerance:
1e-6
Lumped ports (×12):
L = 14.86 nH, C = 5.5 fF, direction +Y
Metal:
PEC (superconducting electrodes & ground)
Enclosure:
First-order absorbing (radiation) boundary
12
Qubit LC Ports
4 GHz
Target Band
~10 min
GPU Solve Time
AMS
Auxiliary-Space PC
| Parameter | Value | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Junction inductance L | 14.86 nH | Sets the Josephson (kinetic) energy of each qubit |
| Shunt capacitance C | 5.5 fF | Sets the charging energy / anharmonicity |
| Substrate εᵣ (in-plane) | 9.3 | Sapphire dielectric — loads the resonances |
| Substrate εᵣ (c-axis) | 11.5 | Uniaxial anisotropy of the crystal |
| Loss tangent tan δ | 3–8.6 ×10⁻⁵ | Ultra-low dielectric loss → high coherence |
| Number of qubit ports | 12 | Size of the coupled array |
The lumped L and C linearize each Josephson junction; the solver targets the lowest modes near 4 GHz, the operating band of transmon qubits. Sapphire's tiny loss tangent is why it is a workhorse substrate for high-coherence quantum hardware.
Sapphire is not an isotropic dielectric — its permittivity differs along the crystal c-axis (11.5) versus in-plane (9.3), and the model even rotates the material axes to match the wafer cut. Capturing this anisotropy is essential: it shifts qubit and resonator frequencies by amounts far larger than the fabrication tolerances engineers are trying to hit, so an isotropic approximation would mis-predict the spectrum.
The energy postprocessing over the substrate reports how much of each mode's electric energy sits inside the lossy dielectric — the participation ratio. Combined with the loss tangent, this is the quantity that sets the dielectric-limited quality factor and, ultimately, qubit coherence times. The energy-density map above shows exactly where the fields concentrate, and therefore where loss and stray coupling will originate.
Predict qubit and coupler frequencies of a full chip layout before fabrication, and catch frequency collisions early in the design cycle.
Quantify how neighbouring qubits hybridize and share energy, informing coupler design and gate-error budgets across the array.
Use dielectric participation ratios and loss tangents to estimate dielectric-limited Q and guide substrate and geometry choices.
Extend the same eigenmode workflow to readout resonators, Purcell filters, and bus cavities that share the chip with the qubits.
Powered by Palace — AWS's open-source, GPU-accelerated 3D finite-element solver for full-wave electromagnetics
Lumped-port junctions — model transmon qubits and couplers as LC elements directly inside the full-chip solve
Anisotropic materials — capture sapphire's uniaxial permittivity and rotated crystal axes for accurate frequencies
Energy participation postprocessing — the loss and coherence metrics that matter for quantum hardware, on cloud GPUs
NumericalAI brings production-grade electromagnetic simulation to an intuitive cloud interface — no solver installation, no cluster administration, no meshing bottleneck.
Tape out with confidence: verify qubit frequencies, couplings, and dielectric loss across a full multi-qubit chip in a single GPU run, catching costly frequency collisions before a wafer is ever fabricated.
Run full-wave eigenmode simulations of superconducting qubit chips with Palace on NumericalAI. Upload your Palace config.json and mesh, and get mode frequencies and field maps on cloud GPUs.
© 2026 NumericalAI, all rights reserved. |Privacy Policy |Terms of Service |Executive brief |FAQ